In addition, it has the same task to predict mortality. A summary of the covariate features can be found in Table 5.

High model performance, on average, can hide that models may systematically underperform on subgroups of the data.

This study explores the potential of using training dynamics as an automated alternative to human annotation for evaluating the quality of training data. The framework used is Data Maps, which classifies data points into categories such as easy-to-learn, hard-to-learn, and ambiguous (Swayamdipta et al., 2020). Swayamdipta et al. (2020) highlight that difficult-to-learn examples often contain errors, and ambiguous cases significantly impact model training. To confirm the reliability of these findings, we replicated the experiments using a challenging dataset, with a focus on medical question answering. In addition to text comprehension, this field requires the acquisition of detailed medical knowledge, which further complicates the task. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted to assess the feasibility and transferability of the Data Maps framework to the medical domain. The evaluation indicates that the framework is unsuitable for addressing datasets' unique challenges in answering medical questions.

Multi-Task Learning (MTL) is a powerful technique that has gained popularity due to its performance improvement over traditional Single-Task Learning (STL). However, MTL is often challenging because there is an exponential number of possible task groupings, which can make it difficult to choose the best one, and some groupings might produce performance degradation due to negative interference between tasks. Furthermore, existing solutions are severely suffering from scalability issues, limiting any practical application. In our paper, we propose a new data-driven method that addresses these challenges and provides a scalable and modular solution for classification task grouping based on hand-crafted features, specifically Data Maps, which capture the training behavior for each classification task during the MTL training. We experiment with the method demonstrating its effectiveness, even on an unprecedented number of tasks (up to 100).

High model performance, on average, can hide that models may systematically underperform on subgroups of the data. We consider the tabular setting, which surfaces the unique issue of outcome heterogeneity - this is prevalent in areas such as healthcare, where patients with similar features can have different outcomes, thus making reliable predictions challenging. To tackle this, we propose Data-IQ, a framework to systematically stratify examples into subgroups with respect to their outcomes. We do this by analyzing the behavior of individual examples during training, based on their predictive confidence and, importantly, the aleatoric (data) uncertainty. Capturing the aleatoric uncertainty permits a principled characterization and then subsequent stratification of data examples into three distinct subgroups (Easy, Ambiguous, Hard). We experimentally demonstrate the benefits of Data-IQ on four real-world medical datasets. We show that Data-IQ's characterization of examples is most robust to variation across similarly performant (yet different) models, compared to baselines. Since Data-IQ can be used with any ML model (including neural networks, gradient boosting etc.), this property ensures consistency of data characterization, while allowing flexible model selection. Taking this a step further, we demonstrate that the subgroups enable us to construct new approaches to both feature acquisition and dataset selection. Furthermore, we highlight how the subgroups can inform reliable model usage, noting the significant impact of the Ambiguous subgroup on model generalization.

Rapid development in deep learning model construction has prompted an increased need for appropriate training data. The popularity of large datasets - sometimes known as "big data" - has diverted attention from assessing their quality. Training on large datasets often requires excessive system resources and an infeasible amount of time. Furthermore, the supervised machine learning process has yet to be fully automated: for supervised learning, large datasets require more time for manually labeling samples. We propose a method of curating smaller datasets with comparable out-of-distribution model accuracy after an initial training session using an appropriate distribution of samples classified by how difficult it is for a model to learn from them.